Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum banner

Slightly longer or slightly shorter shocks better

8.2K views 11 replies 4 participants last post by  BajaSurfnDirt83  
#1 ·
I’ve searched around and haven’t found the answer hopefully you guys can help. If I’ve got a lift that falls right in between 2 lengths of shocks what would be better . I’m looking at 2 different fix 2.0 performance reservior shocks for my 2012 f350. The lift is 5” in front and there are 2 different options one shock is for 4-6” of lift and offer 10.1” of travel or the ones for 5.5-7” of lift and offers 11.1” of travel. Supposedly I’ll have roughly 10.9” of travel with my suspension system. So the longer shocks seem like it would be best

it seems like the slightly longer shocks would offer the full range of travel but would be slightly deeper in the compression range just at normal driving. I’m no expert so I’m just trying to wrap my head around it.
Any help would be great especially for you guys who know how the fox 2.0’s are valved and if it’ll make my ride harsh by it sitting an inch or so deeper or if it’ll cause me bottom out issues
 
#2 ·
You have just a 5” lift and are getting 10 inches of travel? In factory settings, shouldn’t you have like 3 inches or so compression at most before engaging bump stops upfront?
what are you doing w the truck? If just driving around town and the occasional off-road adventure , if I was in your shoes, I’d go with the longer shock, so long as you have your bump stops where they should be.
 
#3 ·
You want longer shocks, not shorter shocks as a general rule. You don't want to top out a "short shock" when you compress your lifted suspension. Of course the same can be said for the "extended" length when you hang a wheel in the air letting the suspension fully extend. Hence the use of limiting straps....

With that you should look more to what's the compressed specs of the suspension. Stop worrying about the amount of travel.
 
#4 ·
FYI:
Compressed length for the stock shocks: fronts are 15.5" and on the rear 20.2".

I had decided to use shocks for a 6" lift on a lift under 4". When researching the numbers the application for the 6" shocks were better suited for the application. They gave the length required for suspension full extension and fell close enough to the suspension full compression that there should never be a shock issue.
 
#5 ·
The fully compressed specs of the 5.5”-7” shocks are 16.2” so with the additional 5” of lift I should stay right in the range. Fully extended I’ll be fine as with the suspension hung on the jack stands it appears the coils become unloaded right at about where the shocks bottom out or maybe there is 1/2” left in the shock, but limiting straps will keep everything in the correct range.

but another thing I’m just wondering about is where the truck rides in the valved range of the shock ? I’d like a pretty plush Carli like ride so I don’t want it to be sitting in a stiffer section of the shocks valved range at normal weighted ride height
 
#6 ·
Is there any reason you are not just ordering a kit of shocks for your trucks specific lift kit?

Did you have the lift kit installed on your truck after you bought it? If so purchase a set of replacement shocks for that specific kit.
If you don't know the exact kit from the manufacture look for some part numbers.

As others mentioned longer is GENERALLY better but too long causes issues with bottoming out, and to short has the same in reverse.
 
#7 ·
It’s a combo kit I’m putting together of carli and icon and PMF stuff, it’s not a full kit, I’m saving a few grand by piecing it together myself and installing it myself with exception of the rear full leaf packs as they are too big and heavy for me by myself and no lift. every shock has a working range there is no shock except maybe super high dollar kings that are completely built straight up for a 5” or a 4.5” lift etc etc. I’m assuming even Carli uses a specific fox part # for their 4.5” backcountry before they custom valve them. so I’m trying to see what would be best for falling in my range. I understand the bottoming out etc etc
 
#8 ·
Sure wish I had a better knowledge of the workings of a shock and such. It seems easy enough but there's much more to it of course. I think were I get confused is the whole valving and how the fluid stays separated from the air inside the body (if there's air).

If I do understand it correctly then the better thought is to keep shocks within the full compression range of the suspension and limiting the extension. It seems easier to prevent damage to the shock.

With that there's the "application" : If you are doing a Baja course your shocks are 100% different than people just towing the boat to the lake on the daily. The same can be said for the ride that one will encounter.

I was told you always want to allow compression (within reason and controlled read "valving") and control rebound once again....valving. Where is the "working range"? 2" of suspension travel....or 10" of suspension travel?? The same shock built/valved for either is going to ride differently.