I'm glad you cleared that up cause I was looking at it and I thought it was even but wasnt sure so I figured Id question it haha I guess you guys arent as bad as I thought :thumb:
I'm glad you cleared that up cause I was looking at it and I thought it was even but wasnt sure so I figured Id question it haha I guess you guys arent as bad as I thought :thumb:It does have that illusion in the pictures you are not the first ask.
we start with a piece like in the picture below. The intake is not made as the passenger side first and then the driver side stubbed in as it looks.
The engine is pulling air equally and the intake is pressurized evenly.
But we would like to hear everyone's thoughts on this.
![]()
Done good find thanksCfd- minor detail, but you may consider editing the last line in the first post of this thread.
Would you foresee a EFR turbo vs the 66 helping with that lag? From how I understand it, EFRs spool a lot quicker, correct?You can but it'd be very laggy. We can custom build it with a tighter housing but the price will go up.
Ours has been completed quite sometime. We however choose to R&D our kit before we let any pictures surface or sell it to any customers. Nothing will EVER leave SPE without being R&D'd first. :thumb: We have turned down countless customers who wanted to purchase our compound kit, single kits, & dual fuelers because we aren't through with the R&D yet.We are willing to build anything that the customer wants it would just take time and also money and if you want it now then you'd have to trust us on our knowledge on turbo sizing and such. Obviously when it comes to that we know what were doing. Not saying everyone "copied" us but we all are using a similar turbo and ours was out months before.
Ours has been completed quite sometime. We however choose to R&D our kit before we let any pictures surface or sell it to any customers. Nothing will EVER leave SPE without being R&D'd first. :thumb: We have turned down countless customers who wanted to purchase our compound kit, single kits, & dual fuelers because we aren't through with the R&D yet.
Amy,
We understand the that you took some extra time to test stuff.
On the dual fueler I can understand wanting to do some thorough r and d, especially running the cp4 out of time. As you see h and s has one for sale, but you still can't get it until July.
When a customer is broke down, and needs a repair, he is tired of putting the same turbo back on and asked us for help, that is what we did.
We realize there is no possible way SPE would do that.
I think the main difference is we are still mostly a repair shop. So we just fix broken trucks on a day to day basis. The products we develop are a by product of the solutions we find to common problems. Installing a fixed geometry turbo on a truck is something we do all the time, so we really didn't see this as a major challenge.
Correct me if I am wrong but SPE is a aftermarket performance development shop that specializes in 6.7 FORD. You guys are set up for r and d.
We sort of have 2 different business models.
FWIW it is great to have you here and we really want to bury the hatchet and just talk about the benefits of these turbo's and upgrades.
I would like to apologize for any hard feeling my guys have caused you.
Do you think this is possible?
Go drink some shine, sit by a fire and make some duck noises.... :hehe::nana::lol:This thread gives me a headache.
I like the way you think!!!Go drink some shine, sit by a fire and make some duck noises.... :hehe::nana::lol:
Being completely honest. We want our competitors to have an open discussion for the benefit of the customers. We want to eliminate any reason that they are not showing up.From a business stand point? You explain to me the professionalism in that. I would love to hear your theory.