You have to see this

[gcop]

I was about to reply to the post when it first showed up, but I too elected to stay silent. But I have to say it's just more rhetoric than anything. I mean come on Al Gore.....???? The dude is a first class bomb throwing douch bag.

Marc is right on the points touched on in his post. One thing I seem to hear in re: to big Al's movie, is ...it's the hottest, or coldest, or whatever on record. That would be a vailid point, if weather record keeping went back about 5000 years but it doesn't.

[99Smokin73Stroker]

I knew this topic would get someone going! Mission accomplished!

[gonecheenin]

My geologist girlfriend said almost exactly the same thing marc just did

[stomper2]

Agree'd somke. BUT, it is interesting to find out what others opinion's are on topic's such as this. Me, I just want to enjoy my time while I'm here. As far as I'm concerend, the world is going to hell in a hand basket anyways.

[mschn99]

hey....it could be worse...it could be that email going around that the pentagon wasnt hit by a plane on 9/11.....that it was actually the US government shooting a missle at it

[gcop]

The old "missle into the Pentagon" email LOL Geeez who starts that BS? Oh wait nevermind....

Discussion is great, as long as we have the FACTS.

[mschn99]

Originally Posted by gcop

The old "missle into the Pentagon" email LOL Geeez who starts that BS? Oh wait nevermind....

Disussion is great, as long as we have the FACTS.

lol...i figured that would rile you or rod up....

[gcop]

Oh yeah just a little bit......

[Rodslinger]

Originally Posted by mschn99

lol...i figured that would rile you or rod up....

It's no secret around these parts my political persuasion. There HAS to be a tongue biting smiley around the web SOMEWHERE...........just consider that my post to this thread.


Al Gore's a weenie.

[jtomasik]

Actually, it's difficult to determine exactly how we're altering the environment. Detailed data about historical weather patterns becomes exponentially less accurate as we step back in time. There isn't any doubt that we've altered the environment. The argument is whether we've altered it enough to make a difference. The problem is NEITHER side has enough accurate data to support either opinion.

It's best to take a neutral position in this matter. The only facts we have is that we're often confident in our opinion, but we're also often wrong, too. Taking one definitive side or the other is just an indication of emotional bias in the argument, and nothing more.