- HOME - FORUMS - GARAGE - ARTICLES - CHAT - CLASSIFIEDS - VIDEOS - TECH - STORE - SPONSORS -
- REGISTER - CALENDAR - SITE HELP - ARCADE - STAFF - MEMBERSHIP - GET A QUOTE - CONTACT US -

Welcome to the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum, the fastest growing Ford Diesel Community on the internet!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us

Go Back   Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum > Powerstroke.ORG News and Polls > Powerstroke.ORG News
Active Topics Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Powerstroke.ORG News News related to Ford Diesels as well as site news. Only Administrators may create new threads in this section.

 
       

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 05:00 AM
bigwhite7.3stroker bigwhite7.3stroker is offline
Florida Stroker
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sebring,Fl
Posts: 5,064
interesting info but can't see myself getting a gasser
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 06:41 AM
rdc rdc is offline
A Former "Turd Brown" Mod
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lexington, OK
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
Why not direct inject the gasoline too? Why don't they make a direct injection compression ignition gasser?
I suppose you could direct inject the gasoline on the intake stroke, but
injecting on the compression stroke like a diesel?

The gasoline is too volatile. It would explode instead of burn, possibly
destroying the engine.

Am I wrong here? Anybody know if this has been done?
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 07:32 AM
Dirk Dirk is offline
Diesel Innovations
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 9,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdc View Post
I suppose you could direct inject the gasoline on the intake stroke, but
injecting on the compression stroke like a diesel?

The gasoline is too volatile. It would explode instead of burn, possibly
destroying the engine.

Am I wrong here? Anybody know if this has been done?

You *can* inject higher octane. It is cooler, slower burning (no flash like 87). E85 is rated a bit over 100.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 12:14 PM
03dieselman 03dieselman is offline
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Parma, Mi
Posts: 306
If there is going to be a Diesel replacement in the future I just don't see it being E85 that does it. I don't think this E85 is all that it is made out to be, but then again I'm not a scientist.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 04:29 PM
PRWSTRK_Dan PRWSTRK_Dan is offline
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Laramie, Wyoming
Posts: 222
Looks like the 302 is making a come back
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 06:36 PM
Jake Jake is offline
<-----GTP38R
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fostoria, Ohio
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via AIM to Jake Send a message via Yahoo to Jake
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdc View Post
I suppose you could direct inject the gasoline on the intake stroke, but
injecting on the compression stroke like a diesel?

The gasoline is too volatile. It would explode instead of burn, possibly
destroying the engine.

Am I wrong here? Anybody know if this has been done?
Injecting it at or about TDC on the compression stoke is what i mean, just like a diesel.

What if you used multiple injections per cycle to reduce the explosion and sort of turn it into a burn? Maybe like 5 or more smaller injections?
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 08:34 PM
Y2K STROKER Y2K STROKER is offline
Powerstroke.org Rookie
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Black Hawk South Dokota
Posts: 12
Looks appealing, but also potentially problematic.
I'll stay with diesel for a few more hundred years.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2009, 11:20 AM
ductit ductit is online now
Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 67
There are few places around me here in North Texas that carry E85. I like knowing that I am using my vehicles to their full potential. If I had to worry about filling up two tanks and going out of my way to do so it would not be worth it to me. I can point my truck in any direction and get diesel where I am at!!
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2009, 12:03 PM
bockhold bockhold is offline
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West of Tyler, Ben Wheeler TEXAS
Posts: 10,754
Send a message via AIM to bockhold Send a message via MSN to bockhold Send a message via Yahoo to bockhold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Y2K STROKER View Post
Looks appealing, but also potentially problematic.
I'll stay with diesel for a few more hundred years.
ill get back with ya then
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2009, 08:20 PM
blowinsmoke4life blowinsmoke4life is offline
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wilkins Township/ Pittsburgh area, PA
Posts: 1,336
Send a message via AIM to blowinsmoke4life
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanH View Post
I think the person whom wrote " Ford's Twin-Fuel 'Bobcat' Engine Could Replace Power Stroke Diesels" Has never pulled a 14k trailer up a hill.

As far as the "Bobcat" goes, Cool idea. We need companies thinking outside the box.
Way to go ford. Thanks for staying ahead of the game instead of falling behind.
your prolly right about ther trailer thing but at 750lbs-ft of torque i fdont think the engine will have a problem pulling that
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
vB.Sponsors