Heavy-Duty Truck Prices Could Jump $15,000 in Order to Meet CAFE Regulations - Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum
Powerstroke.ORG News News related to Ford Diesels as well as site news. Only Administrators may create new threads in this section.

User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 24 Old 09-14-2010, 02:21 PM Thread Starter
Powerstroke.org Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Heavy-Duty Truck Prices Could Jump $15,000 in Order to Meet CAFE Regulations


Ever since it's inception, the Federal Government's Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards program has never been far from controversy. With the proposed 35 miles per gallon standard less than a decade away; auto manufacturers are struggling to find ways of meeting these fleet average targets. Because light trucks as well as cars are now included in the targets, domestic automakers like Ford, GM and Chrysler are likely to find the new regulations particularly tough to deal with, since a great deal of their profit still rests on truck production. Now, thanks to a meeting in May, when President Obama called on the EPA and Department of Transportation to included medium and heavy-duty vehicles within the CAFE umbrella (under different and yet undisclosed fuel economy standards), things have become even more messy and complicated.

Recently a 414 page report, issued by The National Academies (a group made up of academics, business leaders, scientists and experts from the financial, oil and transportation industries) stated that in order for pickups, especially medium-duty ones to meet CAFE targets greater than current fuel economy standards; new technologies will have to be utilized or the automakers risk heavy fines.

Either way, sticker prices could increase by as much as $15,000 per truck once the regulations are enforced. According to Charlie Territo, a spokesperson for the Washington D.C. based Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, "costs will depend on the specific fuel economy targets and the cost of the technology that needs to be added. What remains to be seen is whether consumers are willing to pay those costs."

The report cites a number of potential avenues for saving fuel on pickups, including turbocharging and using smaller displacement engines; hybrid drivetrains and more efficient diesel engines, still another, more simpler proposal is raising taxes on the fuel itself. However when it comes to technology the key issue is being able to balance more fuel efficient drivetrains with weight savings, especially difficult considering the amount of safety equipment is now mandated by the Feds on modern vehicles.

Whatever the proposed medium and heavy-duty CAFE requirements end up being, you can bet that they will likely hurt small business and contractors, those that currently rely on medium and heavy-duty pickups and represent the largest segment of buyers in this market. And to make matters worse, much of America's wealth is built on small businesses, the kind that use pickups. So while the CAFE regulations might have had good intentions reducing greenhouse gases and oil dependence, at this juncture, given the targets already outlined, the economic effects are likely to be disastrous in an already depressed business environment, unless significant changes to the CAFE standards that include more realistic short term targets are added.

More: Heavy-Duty Truck Prices Could Jump $15,000 in Order to Meet CAFE Regulations on AutoGuide.com
AutoGuide.com is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 24 Old 09-14-2010, 02:32 PM
Emergency Services
 
Shooter04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,593
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Thumbs down

What.....the.....****

Great....now my goal of a new F250 King Ranch will NEVER happen. Looks like I'll be stuck with Big Blue for a looooooooonngg time if this actually goes through.

2000 F250 XLT SB SC Auto
6" Lift, 37" BFG KM2's, 18" V-Tec Raptors, DIY Intake, Muffler Delete,
Cortex 1950 (), Kenwood Stereo/Amp/Speakers, Extra Cup Holders!! ( )




115,000 miles and rolling strong
Shooter04 is offline  
post #3 of 24 Old 09-14-2010, 02:41 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
well its just a f-ing money exchange between government motors and mopar between the government.... and ford is gettin screwed in all this. GOOD JOB AMERICA TRYIN TO HELP THESE AUTOMAKERS SURVIVE WITH THIS EPA BULL ****

10,000 Lakes Chapter

04 f350 sc lb 4x4 35" pro comp xtreme, sct, gauges, FCDP full egr delete, coolant filter, ARP studs, High idle mod, Stage 1 Turbo, Zoodad mod, kenwood dnx-5120 w/bluetooth, kicker speakers, viper auto smart start w/alarm. rollin coal in MN
coolman3030 is offline  
post #4 of 24 Old 09-14-2010, 02:58 PM
Member
 
Windturbineguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: ROAD WARRIOR
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Easy solution... Buy now and be grandfathered in
Windturbineguy is offline  
post #5 of 24 Old 09-14-2010, 06:53 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 
Raul@Stealth Automotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 20,359
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 30 Times in 17 Posts
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Raul@Stealth Automotive
Raul@Stealth Automotive is offline  
post #6 of 24 Old 09-14-2010, 07:18 PM
Powerstroke.org Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Wow, with the current 2011 Superduty's going for $60k plus, then add another $15k, were talking lamborghini prices!!
Heckler is offline  
post #7 of 24 Old 09-15-2010, 05:35 AM
Compression Ignition Addict
 
Quickhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Akron/Canton, Ohio
Posts: 736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I can see it now . . . new Chevy 3500"LD" gets 35mpg and can tow a max of 400lbs through a 5th wheel!!! LOL

Since that dumb monkey couldn't buy Ford I guess he will try to put them out of business . . . Ford still sells the most trucks combined each month so they will be most effected by this.

We need less regulation period! First they rip us a new one with the fuel now this?? Hopefully we are grandfathered in . . . I'd like to see Nancy Pelosi tell me my 7.3 needs to get 35mpg, I'd stick her face in front of my tailpipe and make her face match her master!

2008 F350 CCSB FX4 Amsoil fluids, S&B intake, 5" exhaust, Egr delete, Boss V plow, Mega Duty Title mod. http://www.analyticpc.net/
Quickhorse is offline  
post #8 of 24 Old 09-15-2010, 06:54 AM
Powerstroke.org Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canton, Georgia
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to kramocramed
The emissions and fuel economy regulations we have todsy are already ****ing ridiculous. This is going to do nothing but harm.

2009 F-350 Crew Cab, 8ft Bed, Lariat, 6.4L Powerstroke, SRW
2007 Ranger Sport, Regular Cab, 3.0L Vulcan,
kramocramed is offline  
post #9 of 24 Old 09-15-2010, 07:18 AM
Real Men of Genius
 
Super Diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,304
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raul@Stealth Automotive View Post
ill stick with my 7.3L now lol
Seconded that Raul, i'm with you

Chris | 2005 F-250 RCSB
Super Diesel is offline  
post #10 of 24 Old 09-15-2010, 10:19 AM
Compression Ignition Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
This is getting a bit ridiculous. Fuel economy is great, but not if you can't afford the truck in the first place. Leave it to our gubment to stick another hurdle in place to trip up the auto industry. Good job Obamabots!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianstew
There is a difference in a government acting responsibly within their powers, and a government that just decides what their powers are and what responsibility means based on political whimsy.
ianstew is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome