2003 6.0 vs 2004 6.0 Excursion - Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum
General Diesel Discussion Discuss everything else pertaining to Diesel Pickups.

User Tag List

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 Old 11-22-2012, 02:20 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
2003 6.0 vs 2004 6.0 Excursion

I am looking at two different Excursions locally for sale. I am new to the 6.0 but am aware of the problems associated and the fixes too. I have done quite a bit of reading on this site in regards to them.

The first is a stock 2003 Excursion 6.0 Eddie Bauer Edition with 65,000 miles. Nothing has been done in regards to cold air intake, exhaust or EGR delete.

The next is a 2004 Excursion 6.0 Eddie Bauer Edition. 80,000 miles. It has cold air intake, 4" exhaust and A-pillar gauges.

They are priced about the same. The 2004 is about $2000 less than the 2003.

I am going to call on both tomorrow to find out about EGR, coolant filter and oil cooler upgrades. Is it worth spending the $ to put the exhaust and cold air intake on the 2003 with less miles. Or is the 15,000 miles insignificant? They are both in good shape with newer tires and brakes. The 2004 has DVD and I don't think the 2003 does.
I am more interested in the mechanical aspect of the vehicles though. Like I said I know the 6.0s had problems. I have read that after 2005-2006 the problems were resolved. Does that mean the 2003s and 2004s are not any good and should not be purchased?

Sorry for the long post but this would be a significant amount of money to spend and really don't like wasting money. I like both vehicles as far as the looks of them so again, it comes down to mechanics and aftermarket parts.

Thank you,
dart69bigblock is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 Old 11-22-2012, 08:48 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,264
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 44 Times in 42 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
lot rot is probably the biggest concern with either one. go take a look at both, check for codes, and look for the obvious telltales.

2005 F350 srw Crewcab lariat. 6.0 diesel aka Sherman
Carstairs Alberta
nitrogen is offline  
post #3 of 3 Old 11-24-2012, 07:21 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
6.0f250firstcar's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 3,593
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 62 Times in 46 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
First off, do you have a monitor?

And no, the mileage difference means nothing on a diesel.

If it were me I'd choose the 03.

6.0f250firstcar is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome