Is it just me, or does this seem backwards? - Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum
General 6.7 Discussion General 6.7 Discussion

Powerstroke.org is the premier Diesel Truck Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2011, 03:23 PM
Serving Our Country!
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Is it just me, or does this seem backwards?

The engine designers confuse me. So the diesels come with intercoolers to condense air to put more oxygen in the cylinder. Awesome! But then they put this big, heavy, ugly egr on the engine. Now correct me if im wrong but the egr's only purpose is to circulate exhaust back throught the intake. This is to reduce the oxygen content by taking up space that would otherwise be filled with oxygen rich air. With less oxygen the cylinder temp is lowered to avoid producing NOx (which happens around 1,250 F) to pass emissions.

Now tell me doesnt this sound counter productive??? I have a simple solution, for roughly the same cost manufacturers could install a factory water- methanol injection system that would do the same thing, increase power, and not clog your intake with soot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 04-26-2011, 03:32 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: hudson, fl
Posts: 2,924
Thanks: 2
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
off topic but i saw in your sig 65 f100 diesel swap, got any pics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 04-26-2011, 04:01 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 691
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Americanmade89,you should pick up the May 2011 Diesel power mag it has a section in it that says "Water injection VS,Intercooler" Both can reduce EGT,But which is right for you?

Man ,they show one Pic,where they spray water Directly into the Turbocharger, :~0 it says this can lead to pooling and possible corrosion,so it's mostly reserved for competition -only vehicles...pretty cool I think :~)

That Mag also has a section on the 6.7 Getting the Full deletes, they say that EGR weighed 25 Lbs and really exposed the passengers side vaule cover when they removed it...

its a good read :~)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 04-26-2011, 04:31 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Oil patch, North Dakota
Posts: 664
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
when it has to do with emmissions regulations all common sence goes out the window! its kinda like burning fuel to clean out the DPF or the cash for clunkers program. if it has the label "green" on it, it probly dosent make common sence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 04-26-2011, 04:55 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Feedback Score: 7 reviews
The EGR's job is not to re-route exhaust gases into the intake. The EGR's job is to reduce emissions. Routing exhaust gases into the intake is how it accomplishes that. I'm sure when/if the auto industry finds a more efficient way to reduce emissions that they will give it a go!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 04-26-2011, 05:19 PM
Serving Our Country!
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by campbellflage View Post
off topic but i saw in your sig 65 f100 diesel swap, got any pics?
No sorry man, its back in Illinois and I'm in California till December on active duty. Once December rolls around and I EAS I'll be sure to post some pics of it. But to fill you in, I'm currently doin a frame off resto on it and it will be recieving a 12v cummins 6bt with a zf 6 speed manual. Debating on hydralic steering, or leavin it manual
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 04-26-2011, 05:26 PM
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
The turbo and CAC isn't for extra or more oxygen into the chamber for combustion. The turbo and CAC is to put more "air" into the chamber for cooling and a cleaner combustion. The EGR idea isn't a positive thing for engineers, it's just one way of meeting EPA requirements. They didn't add EGR for power or efficiency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 04-26-2011, 05:35 PM
Serving Our Country!
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Lead Foot, Definatly a great read, and actually what started my rant! I love Diesel Power

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyCody View Post
when it has to do with emmissions regulations all common sence goes out the window! its kinda like burning fuel to clean out the DPF or the cash for clunkers program. if it has the label "green" on it, it probly dosent make common sence.
Totally agree with you, I hope here in a couple years they figure out the learning curve just like gas motors had to back in the '70s. But really the tech is already there with PCCI, and individual hydralicaly operated valves, cummins even has a concept to recapture lost heat energy. Thermal effeciency will be the key to future engine designs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dazdillenger View Post
The EGR's job is not to re-route exhaust gases into the intake. The EGR's job is to reduce emissions. Routing exhaust gases into the intake is how it accomplishes that. I'm sure when/if the auto industry finds a more efficient way to reduce emissions that they will give it a go!
I understand EGR's job is NOx reduction, but I'm just saying I think water meth could do it more efficiently for roughly the same cost to the manufaturer. All egr does is help reduce cylinder temp, which is exactly what water meth does without all the soot in your intake
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 04-26-2011, 05:51 PM
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
EGR doesn't reduce cylinder temp, it actually raises it by recirculating spent gases. It's all there to insure a cleaner burning exhaust by double burning partial exhaust gas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 04-26-2011, 05:56 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Beautiful BC
Posts: 534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
EGR does indeed lower cylinder temps....that is the whole point of it. Lower cylinder temps, lower NOX....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

vB.Sponsors