![]() |
Please Visit our Site Sponsors
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
| General 6.7 Discussion General 6.7 Discussion |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Ford's back at it!
Looks like Ford has made a comeback to Chevy's claim to "They did a test with our 2010 truck and not our 2011!" Watch it and weep chevy boys!
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
|||
|
SSSWWWWWEEEEEEETTTTTTT!!!!!
|
|
|||
|
suck on that bow tie boys.
|
|
|||
|
Too bad cummin's just uped it's torque to 800. HP stayed the same tho.
|
|
|||
|
It would be cool to know what happens to fuel mileage when they regen (not just 3 gallon run) or the DEF consumed per mile, because that would have to be considered in operation cost per mile.
|
|
|||
|
Is that engine even available yet?
|
|
|||
|
cummins came out with a new motor? or just upped power?
|
|
|||
|
I'm with ars5147. These tests don't mean crap. Lets see a 1000 or 1500 mile test and put regen and def in the equation then I'll give whoever bragging rights.
|
|
|||
|
meh. the commercials are cheesy.
im wanting to see them break. ultra un realistic test. then the average Joe test that gets used for work. 365 days a year. that would be impressive. but it will never happen. Last edited by Jarrod B; 02-21-2011 at 02:07 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() This is according to the TDR, of which my father is a member who told me. Plus I saw a comercial on tv sayin they uped the torque. (yes I watch that much tv )
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|