- HOME - FORUMS - GARAGE - ARTICLES - CHAT - CLASSIFIEDS - VIDEOS - TECH - STORE - SPONSORS -
- REGISTER - CALENDAR - SITE HELP - ARCADE - STAFF - MEMBERSHIP - GET A QUOTE - CONTACT US -

Welcome to the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum, the fastest growing Ford Diesel Community on the internet!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us

Go Back   Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum > Specialty Forums > Off-Topic > Big Rigs
Active Topics Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Big Rigs Over the road truckin' talk

 
       

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2007, 11:12 PM
StarDriver StarDriver is offline
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 696
I've drive both a 379 Pete and also a T-2000 Kenworth, both have their strengths, it is just what you want to do.

I would go with a 475HP, (With a 13 or 18 speed so you can uprate the HP) or 550 Cat.

Other opinions on these, 379/W900, traditional styling, at least a 265 in WB to ride right and tall sleeper, KW 84 inch studio sleeper. These ride pretty well, but the cab is somewhat narrow but still a great truck. Though with the long wheelbase it does take a little more room to manuver these trucks. BUT, if your good enough, it doesn't matter.

T-2000/389 These have a wider cab, taller sleeper, setback front axle, somewhat more aerodynamic. Same powertrains as 379s.

FYI, if your going to travel the 48 states AND Canada, you can only have a 244 inch WB truck, keep that in mind.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2007, 07:30 PM
Vaquero45 Vaquero45 is offline
Serving Our Country!
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarDriver View Post
T-2000/389 These have a wider cab, taller sleeper, setback front axle, somewhat more aerodynamic. Same powertrains as 379s.
Did you mean 387? It's the aero styled Pete, same as the T2000 except for headlights and emblems. The 389 is the new version of the 379, the 379's are no longer in production. Another option is the 386. It's the classic style cab and sleeper with an aero hood and set back front axle.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007, 06:50 AM
StarDriver StarDriver is offline
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 696
Oops my mistake, I've been driving buses too long now.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2007, 07:27 AM
straycat straycat is offline
Moderator
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Surrey B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,527
Hey Stroked, which Cat you got in the KW.

Gord.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2007, 06:12 PM
Stroked95 Stroked95 is offline
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OREGON
Posts: 1,106
3406e, 550 with the fueling tables turned up a little. Actually its my dads truck. He said there is a guy with a newer pete with a factory 600 CAT that can't ahng with him on the hills, said the pete had 74K, while dad was at the limit with 79.5K and as close as the pete got was his hood was even with the door before dad started pulling away from him. That was the second time the same guy had tried to out run him. He is looking at getting the pittsburg power chip, and an upgraded turbo. I'm also trying to talk him into getting the turbine housing and exhaust mainfold ceramic coated. I think he might just do it.

On edit: Forgot to ask, but what are you running Stray?
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 11:05 PM
straycat straycat is offline
Moderator
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Surrey B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,527
sweet, sounds nice, I like the 06 E, great motor. I have the C15 550hp Cat, 1850 ft/lbs of torque, 18 speed and 3.55s, she's got legs hahaha. Pulls the smasher (7-8% grade for 17 miles) down 2 1/2 gears at the steepest point at 1100 rpm, weighing in at about 75,000, can't believe how well it pulls down there.

Gord.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2007, 09:13 AM
Lowboy Lowboy is offline
Old Dirt Contractor
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Minden Nevada
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stroked95 View Post
3406e, 550 with the fueling tables turned up a little. Actually its my dads truck. He said there is a guy with a newer pete with a factory 600 CAT that can't ahng with him on the hills, said the pete had 74K, while dad was at the limit with 79.5K and as close as the pete got was his hood was even with the door before dad started pulling away from him. That was the second time the same guy had tried to out run him. He is looking at getting the pittsburg power chip, and an upgraded turbo. I'm also trying to talk him into getting the turbine housing and exhaust mainfold ceramic coated. I think he might just do it.

On edit: Forgot to ask, but what are you running Stray?

I'll give this thread a push. If he does get the Pittsburgh puter make sure he asks the Pitts guy if he should turn the stock puter back to stock. A Pitts box will sometimes create too much fueling on a mod stocker.

I run a pitts box on a 15.8 Cat marine motor in a 379 Pete that's 800 everyday hp after I changed the turbo and got rid of the waste gate. Makes a 550 seem like a 425.

Cat choked the C16 600's turbo down for faster spoolup to meet emmisions. Kinda takes the fun out of trucking.. Not to mention they also killed fuel mileage trying to please the feds..
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2007, 10:38 AM
straycat straycat is offline
Moderator
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Surrey B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,527
Sounds sweet there Lowboy, haven't run into anyone with the Pits box on their truck up here, but have done some reading on it. The truck in my avitar is a 06e 475, pumped up to 525, and capable of 550. but Cat told me the crank would not hold up to any more than that. I suppose they are right if not driven correctly, but if you are rolling into it rather than jumping on it, I can't see it damaging the crank, but I am no mechanic. What are your thoughts on this.

Gord.

The C 15 refered to in the other post is in the 05 Pete 379 I have, the 900L has the 06E in it.

Last edited by straycat : 07-08-2007 at 10:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2007, 10:42 AM
RRonning84 RRonning84 is offline
Powerstroke.org Fanatic
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shilo, TN
Posts: 122
The 379 Pete is the best I ever drove!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2007, 11:04 AM
dumaisk dumaisk is offline
Serving in the U.S. ARMY!
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 470
379 with a 625 CAT. Purty truck...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
vB.Sponsors
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.