|
|
|
- HOME
- FORUMS
- GARAGE
- ARTICLES
- CHAT
- CLASSIFIEDS
- VIDEOS
- TECH
- STORE
- SPONSORS - - REGISTER - CALENDAR - SITE HELP - ARCADE - STAFF - MEMBERSHIP - GET A QUOTE |
|
Welcome to the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum, the fastest growing Ford Diesel Community on the internet! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
twin turbo setup
What would make a good turbo to match ther stocker for a twin setup? Anyone?
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is a trade off for usable big HP. All the big engines I have ever had with twin's or huge singles all had reduced static compression. Cummins was the lowest one I had at 14:8. They didn't have glow plugs so you crank'm with your foot on the floor then get out and thump the tires. The atomized fuel would light easier the next cranking. I'm shure the EPA would have spit if they saw the smoke that was emitted during warmup. Cylinder filling verses static compresion ratio can make big HP with out a melt down.
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Probably went over my head,wife just brought another beer.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|