- HOME - FORUMS - GARAGE - ARTICLES - CHAT - CLASSIFIEDS - VIDEOS - TECH - STORE - SPONSORS -
- REGISTER - CALENDAR - SITE HELP - ARCADE - STAFF - MEMBERSHIP - GET A QUOTE - CONTACT US -

Welcome to the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum, the fastest growing Ford Diesel Community on the internet!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us

Go Back   Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum > Ford Powerstroke 99-03 7.3L Forums > 99-03 7.3L General Discussion
Active Topics Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
       

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 07:12 AM
snakyjake snakyjake is offline
Powerstroke.org Fanatic
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 118
Send a message via Yahoo to snakyjake
The safest answer is to use exactly what Ford recommends you use.

If you wish to explore newer and perhaps better coolants, here's this info:

Be careful about colors. Be careful about "ELC". Be careful about OAT, HOAT, SCA. Don't mix.

Check with a Ford dealership about using their HOAT coolant. They have the Ford Motorcraft Gold Premium. I believe it requires a full flush.

For OAT coolant, what you want is a heavy duty diesel ELC that is OAT and meets Caterpillar EC-1 specifications. Not SCA, not HOAT, not hybrid.

For the T444E engine, build date 2/99 and after, you can use OAT coolant.

For the DT466E/530E engine, build date 8/29/98, you can use OAT coolant.

I also don't remember which engines have problems with cavitation. I thought some cylinder liners were exempt from having to use cavitation protection.

I'm not sure if one is better than the other. No one is going to drive this engine up to 600,000 miles, and doubt even 300,000 miles. Does anyone really want to keep fluid in their engine that long? Are there really any advantages? I doubt there's serious advantages. I have not heard of anyone losing their engine because of using the correct coolant with their engine. Fleets are still using SCA. SCA is still the most popular.

Jake
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
vB.Sponsors