WTF? Better MPG's in the Hills than flat?? - Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum
Powerstroke.org is the premier Diesel Truck Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2013, 03:51 PM
Powerstroke.org Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
WTF? Better MPG's in the Hills than flat??

I don't post too much, but thought I'd ask. . . why would I get better mileage driving through the mountains at 70mph than I would on flat ground at 65?? Hand calculated. . .16.4 in the mountains, 12.6 on the flats. Last week I took a road trip from northern CA to Yuma AZ, back to San Diego, then to Vegas, then back to northern CA.

Truck is an '03 with a 7.3. . .here's what's been done to the truck-
8"lift, 35" x 12.5 tires
3.73 gears
Injectors- done before I purchased truck, I'm told a little bigger than stock
Tranny/TC/Valve body- new
Cold Air Intake- new
Turbo back exhaust- new
Turbo- Garret GTP38R- new
Up Pipes, Y Pipe, pedestal- new
Fuel Filter- replaced 4k miles ago
Edge set at 100

I would think mileage would be much better on flat ground, with a lower rpm, not working at all. On the last leg of the trip, I fueled up before the mountains and directly after, just to check mileage to see if I was an idiot. Anyone??

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 10-14-2013, 04:04 PM
Premium Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Higher elevation requiring less fuel? If you took I80 back into CA, I really have no idea, unless the partial throttle going back down increased the average that much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 10-14-2013, 04:10 PM
Powerstroke.org Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macon View Post
Higher elevation requiring less fuel? If you took I80 back into CA, I really have no idea, unless the partial throttle going back down increased the average that much.
That's what I thought on the first leg of the trip. On the way back, it's a much more gradual climb, for a much longer distance than the descent. That's where I got the best mileage. I dunno. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 10-15-2013, 07:44 AM
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
It's probably a result of different filling levels when you filled up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 10-15-2013, 08:19 AM
RollinEarly05...now

 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Klamath Falls
Posts: 3,250
Thanks: 22
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthews View Post
It's probably a result of different filling levels when you filled up.
That's what I would suspect also. Doesn't seem logical that flat ground, going slower will give less mpg... then increasing speed and engine load results in higher mpgs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 10-15-2013, 07:03 PM
Powerstroke.org Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollinEarly99 View Post
That's what I would suspect also. Doesn't seem logical that flat ground, going slower will give less mpg... then increasing speed and engine load results in higher mpgs.
I'd agree, it makes zero sense to me; this is why I paid such close attention on the way back. . . filled till it spilled out(topped off) the last 3 tanks. Would there be anything that'd make the truck run more efficient when it's working harder? Or, more importantly, is it possible that somethings not working correctly(fuel pump/hpop/???) when the truck is under lower RPM's/less boost?

This thing's been a turd since I purchased it. Turbo, pedestal, up-pipes, Y pipe, and tb exhaust made a HUGE difference. Still seems like it's lacking. . .and I'd think mileage would be better. Dunno.

Thanks. . suggestions appreciated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 10-15-2013, 07:19 PM
Powerstroke.org Fanatic
 

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: brighton co
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
SOMETHING WITH THE EDGE MAYBE?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 10-15-2013, 07:29 PM
Compression Ignition Addict
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 1,688
Thanks: 8
Thanked 43 Times in 41 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
If your rpms are too low at 65mpg that lugs the motor and makes it less efficient.

Most people report that the 7.3 is most efficient if cruised at 2000-2200 rpm. So if that's the case, 70 mpg might be better for you.

Also, I've noticed a difference in mpg before from one brand diesel to another.

Too many variables to say for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

vB.Sponsors