![]() |
Please Visit our Site Sponsors
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Just installed Autometer triple gauges, have a question.
I have been running my ScanGauge2 since I bought the truck so I could monitor
trans temps and etc.. I just finished installing my 3 Autometer gauges yesterday. I am curious as to which trans temp is MORE accurate, the Autometer trans side port or the ScanGauge2 reading from the OBDII port. I have about a 15* difference. The scangauge2 is reading 164 and my Autometer is dead smack on 150 if not a tad lower. Just curious if anyone else is running these with gauges. THANKS!! Last edited by primetime1267; 06-16-2012 at 12:30 PM. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
|||
|
Theres ALOT of opinions on this, some will say the sensor in the trans pan is the way to go, others will argue and say a test port or in the supply line to the transcooler is the way to go, but personally if your 15 degrees off and not hauling a heavy load, I wouldn't worry about it, even in the mud you will be ok. I believe the OBDII port reads it from a sensor in the trans so that would be the most accurate one.
|
|
|||
|
I'd agree. Even though the test port is in the trans. It's better to know your hottest temp anyway
I made my Samsung SGH-I997 send this. |
|
|||
|
Could be a sender issue, my truck gauge and auto meter were within a few degrees of one another. i never seen a 15 Deg diff though.
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|