SCA/Cavitation possibility -- deal breaker? - Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum
User Tag List

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 Old 12-27-2009, 10:03 AM Thread Starter Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
SCA/Cavitation possibility -- deal breaker?

I am going now to look at a 1996 PSD F250 4x4. The current owner bought it at about 180k miles and it now has 285k miles. I asked the current owner about SCA levels in the coolant, and he had no idea what I meant. Is this a deal-breaker? Is there any way to check for cavitation before you buy? It obviously hasn't had these levels maintained.

I called Napa for a test strip kit, and they had no idea what I meant. I tried explaining it several different ways, so I guess my local Napa doesn't stock such.

2005 Lotus Elise
2004 Jaguar XJR
2001 Ford Escape (RallyCross)
1996 Honda Accord
1988 Mazda RX7
1987 Acura Integra
1984 M-B 300TD
1981 VW Rabbit (LeMons car)
Sandalwood is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 4 Old 12-27-2009, 11:04 AM
Compression Ignition Addict
pjwoolw's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Ramon Ca.
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Probably a good percentage of these trucks have never been checked or had the SCA added. I know mine was never checked by the PO. Cavitation damage is a possibility but probably would have reared its head by now. I'd be more concerned about the running gear, tranny and suspension myself.

Pete in San Ramon

2005 F250 6.0 4X4 Lariat CC short bed (stock)

1997 F250 7.3 4X4 XLT Reg. cab (stock)

1986 F250 6.9 4X4 XLT Gone but not forgotten

pjwoolw is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old 12-29-2009, 09:50 AM
Compression Ignition Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wellington Nevada
Posts: 8,696
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 38 Times in 38 Posts
Feedback Score: 5 reviews
I've never read anyone posting that it happens...I used to check mine...years never changed.
CT Performance, Inc. is offline  
post #4 of 4 Old 12-29-2009, 10:43 AM Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kamloops, BC Canada
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
My understanding is that the engine block casting was changed between the idi and powerstroke blocks. I have never heard of a Powerstroke block fail due to cavitational porocity. The IDI is a nuther story....had a '91 that failed because of it and it is very common with those blocks.....I still monitor the SCA levels in my Powerstrokes as the IDI experience was as dirty deal....and SCA and test strips are cheap relative to engine failure. As a side note infact that is why (one of the reasons) was initially started way back in the day, was because FMCo didn't support failed blocks and in my experience the dealerships where not even aware of cavitational porocity as late as 95....or at least tried to ignore it....cost me alot of grief back in the day but I'm over it now.....hahahaaaa....I think....


'97 Red F250 CC XLT ZF5 3:55s, Dana 60, SD springs all round, 'jectors, IC, 6.0 fan, TW files, VisionX lights and other stuff.

'96 White/Silver F250 SCSB 4X2 (all stock for now)... 4:10's E4OD.

Truck Pix & write ups

Last edited by jcart; 12-29-2009 at 10:48 AM.
jcart is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome