![]() |
Please Visit our Site Sponsors
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
| 6.0L Performance Parts Discussion What has or has not worked for you? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
SCT vs stock fuel consumption stats- datalogged!
i was board last night so i deciced to grab the laptop and datalog how much fuel was being consumed with the sct live wire performance setting vs stock. interesting stats... hope it can benefit someone.
Performance tune with engine cold: Desired volume of fuel at 40 mph: 19.5% Engine RPM: 1355 Desired volume of fuel at 50 mph: 22% Engine RPM: 1460 Performance tune with engine warm: Desired volume of fuel at 40 mph: 16% Engine RPM: 1370 Desired volume of fuel at 50 mph: 21% Engine RPM: 1460 Engine Idle RPM in Park: 690 Desired volume of fuel in park: 10.3% Engine Idle RPM in gear: 690 Desired volume of fuel in gear: 7.5% Acceleration from 0 to 50 mph at 30% throttle Desired volume of fuel: 40% Standing 0-60 time (no brake boost): 9.51 sec Maximum volume of fuel desired at WOT: 100% Stock engine, warm: Desired volume of fuel at 40 mph: 14.7% Engine RPM: 1315 Desired volume of fuel at 50 mph: 21.4% Engine RPM: 1470 Engine Idle RPM in Park: 690 Desired volume of fuel in park: 10.3 Engine Idle RPM in gear: 690 Desired volume of fuel in gear: 7.1% Acceleration from 0 to 50 mph at 30% throttle Desired volume of fuel: 36% Standing 0-60 time (no brake boost): 12.20 sec Maximum volume of fuel desired at WOT: 74% Variables: Temp: 91 degrees 6.0L diesel with K&N intake and MBRP 4in turbo back exhaust truck was empty with 33' tires and rotations per mile was corrected. AC was off. Desired volume of fuel is measured in miligrams per stroke. For this purops its just a percentage While accelerating 0-50 the fuel desired stayed within 1% the whole time. testing was done on a level, paved road SCT livewire 9600 tuner was used and LiveLink software was used to datalog Stats: The performance tune decreses your 0-60 mph time by 2.69 seconds. On performance tune going 40 MPH your desired fuel is 2.5% higher when the engine is cold On performance tune going 50 MPH your desired fuel is 1% higher when the engine is cold On performance tune your desired fuel at 40 MPH is 1.3% higher than stock On performance tune your desired fuel at 50 MPH is .3% lower than stock On performance tune your desired fuel while accelerating 0-50 at 30% throttle is 4% higher On stock, the maximum volume of fuel used at WOT is 74%, performance tune is 100% Conclusion: the tuner has significant HP and TQ gains with very minimal increase in fuel consumption over stock. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
|||
|
Great Info!
|
|
|||
|
Could you do this test at 60 and 70 mph as well?
|
|
|||
|
Good job on the info!
|
|
|||
|
Well done!
|
|
|||
|
nice write up!
|
|
|||
|
Good job! nice write up.
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|